X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <466D9873.6050406@cygwin.com> <005701c7ac5d$73b53560$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Subject: [ontopic again] RE: [OT] RE: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:47:36 +0100 Message-ID: <007d01c7ac8b$4902a450$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <005701c7ac5d$73b53560$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 11 June 2007 20:20, Dave Korn wrote: > ObTopic: I was going to discuss the libstdc++ ABI change we introduced in > 3.4.4, but since you have announced your intention to post my email address > and get me spammed for my pains if I attempt to help you, I'm not inclined > to do so. However, just to be generically useful, I will point out anyway that the most absolutely reliable and guaranteed way to run two parallel toolchains is by building from source and using an independent --prefix= setting each. You then just need to start a shell and put whichever ${prefix}/bin directory you prefer first in the path, and that toolchain will take preference over everything else. cheers, DaveK ps. still don't want be spammed! -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/