X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 15:01:46 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8
Message-ID: <20070607190146.GA5235@ednor.casa1.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20070606201111.GA2366@ednor.casa1.cgf.cx> <20070607114950.GA3958@implementation> <20070607122642.GA31803@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20070607160859.GA3577@implementation> <20070607163744.GA4972@ednor.casa1.cgf.cx> <20070607164933.GF4110@implementation> <ba40711f0706071041u66e12b81k23639ee67332df49@mail.gmail.com> <20070607174554.GH4110@implementation> <ba40711f0706071139t6dc53eddl9d3c277a95d56ead@mail.gmail.com> <20070607184619.GA14598@implementation>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070607184619.GA14598@implementation>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:46:19AM +0800, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Lev Bishop, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 14:39:17 -0400, a ?crit :
>> On 6/7/07, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> >Lev Bishop, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 13:41:44 -0400, a ?crit :
>> >> ...around 80MByte/sec, which maybe isn't as fast as it could be using
>> >> native functionality, but surely brltty doesn't need *that* much
>> >> bandwidth for transferring text?
>> >
>> >It doesn't need bandwidth, it needs latency.
>> 
>> Latency is...
>> bash-3.2$ ./socat TCP-LISTEN:5001 PIPE & exec
>> 99<>/dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/5001 ; time for (( a=0; a<1000; a++ )); do echo
>> $a >&99; read <&99; done; exec 99>&-
>> [1] 4492
>> 
>> real    0m1.959s
>> user    0m0.062s
>> sys     0m0.172s
>> bash-3.2$
>> [1]+  Done                    ./socat TCP-LISTEN:5001 PIPE
>> 
>> ...about 2ms round-trip. How is this a problem?
>
>This adds up to the screen reader latency, etc.
>
>Really, we tried both, and while tcp/ip was a bit painful, local sockets
>were smooth.

What about unix domain sockets in cygwin?  It sounds like you think they
aren't available.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

