X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Cygwin NFS file size limit ? From: Samuel Robb To: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:28:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1181233692.3680.52.camel@samuelr.hq.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:52 -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote: > I may be off the mark here, but IIRC, nfs-server is a pretty old package Hmph. It's not old, it's *experienced*. You young folks with your zfs and fancy-shmancy network protocols... why, in my day... hmph. > and hasn't been updated in a while, so it may still be compiled against > the older versions of Cygwin that didn't have 64-bit IO. Running nm on > the nfs-server executable (which I currently don't have installed, so > can't do this myself) should show whether I'm right. Joking aside: the current version of the nfs-server package was built againt a version of the cygwin DLL that supported 64-bit I/O. The executable claims that it's importing the 64-bit versions of fopen, lseek, lstat, etc. - so using it with large files *should* work. -Samrobb -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/