X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:49:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8 Message-ID: <20070606144934.GA18463@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20070606085100.GA5082@implementation> <4666819A.52A6488D@dessent.net> <20070606102654.GA11636@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070606102654.GA11636@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:26:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 6 02:42, Brian Dessent wrote: >> Samuel Thibault wrote: >> >> > Mmm, because for a blind person this is a very basic package? >> >> Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that most Cygwin users are blind. > >Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that an accessibility package doesn't >make sense in the Base category. It *might* be better to put it into >Utils, but YMMV depending on your eyesight. With all due respect to blind people, I don't think that we should be putting things in the Base category without consensus. Hopefully other people haven't been doing this either. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/