X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: display ps command line parameters Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:23:18 -0500 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <4edba06c76Andy@jet-net.co.uk> <045201c78b52$9f46e0b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <045201c78b52$9f46e0b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Dave Korn wrote: > On 30 April 2007 18:48, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> um... and since Cygwin has this information, doesn't this mean that 'ps' >> is missing a feature that is standard to pretty much every other *nix >> implementation of 'ps'? (I don't have a POSIX standard handy > > Yes you do: open browser, google "posix opengroup". Vol.2, "Shell and > utilities", part 4: Utilities: takes us to ...and am too lazy to look. :-) Anyway, since the information is available, and most other *nix's 'ps' provides it, any reason Cygwin's 'ps' shouldn't do the same? -- Matthew If you believe you received this e-mail in error, you are probably sadly mistaken, but if not, aren't you lucky? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/