X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:04:08 -0400 From: Bob Rossi To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: SIGTSTP and select Message-ID: <20070413190408.GE25914@cox.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20070403000723.GG24160@cox.net> <20070403003753.GA11244@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070403141320.GA3459@cox.net> <20070413132501.GG15801@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070413140108.GA25914@cox.net> <20070413145136.GK15801@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070413145136.GK15801@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 13 10:01, Bob Rossi wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:07:23PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > When you observed -1/EINTR on Linux, did you install a SIGTSTP signal > handle, maybe? Hi Corinna, Do you think that if I capture the SIGTSTP signal, I could avoid all of this? That is, I would somehow avoid the situation where select has to deal with being in the blocking state while cgdb recieves the signal? I'm not even sure if a process could put itself in the process after catching that signal, but if it could, ... Thanks, Bob Rossi -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/