From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <461A57FE.7030106@veritech.com> <461A5F85.1010709@cygwin.com> <461A65A4.2080905@veritech.com>
Subject: RE: Setup.exe version @ cygwin.com
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:31:03 +0100
Message-ID: <000201c77ac4$77287fb0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <461A65A4.2080905@veritech.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 09 April 2007 17:11, LDR wrote:

> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> LDR wrote:
>>> Since there seems to be "some traffic" on which version of setup.exe is
>>> causing (or not) which problems, might it not be a good idea to include
>>> the version number of setup.exe with the link to the binary on the next
>>> version of setup.exe?
>> 
>> This has been discussed before.  IMO, I don't think putting the version
>> anywhere other than the first page of the app is going to help much.  If
>> someone can't find the version on the first page, they are likely to have
>> problems finding it in the path or executable name.  It is a potential
>> area for a synchronization problem, which would cause more confusion.
>> 
>  At the web site: Cygwin.com!

  That sentence no verb!  Which makes it incoherent as any kind of a reply to
the paragraph above.  Perhaps you should try and explain your ideas more
fully.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/