X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <461A5F85.1010709@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:45:09 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Setup.exe version @ cygwin.com References: <461A57FE.7030106@veritech.com> In-Reply-To: <461A57FE.7030106@veritech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com LDR wrote: > Since there seems to be "some traffic" on which version of setup.exe is > causing (or not) which problems, might it not be a good idea to include > the version number of setup.exe with the link to the binary on the next > version of setup.exe? This has been discussed before. IMO, I don't think putting the version anywhere other than the first page of the app is going to help much. If someone can't find the version on the first page, they are likely to have problems finding it in the path or executable name. It is a potential area for a synchronization problem, which would cause more confusion. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/