X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <461A57FE.7030106@veritech.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:13:02 -0400
From: LDR <lee@veritech.com>
Reply-To: lee@veritech.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Setup.exe version @ cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000083, version=1.0.1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Since there seems to be "some traffic" on which version of setup.exe is
causing (or not) which problems, might it not be a good idea to include
the version number of setup.exe with the link to the binary on the next
version of setup.exe?

Lee

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/