From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <1634.172.31.7.50.1175774951.squirrel@mail.tiet.ac.in> 	 <02ec01c7777b$66fe8ef0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <813e5f920704062130n18018f6dr789e03ca83eb61a4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: dos.h support
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:14:52 +0100
Message-ID: <047a01c778fd$969fe9f0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <813e5f920704062130n18018f6dr789e03ca83eb61a4@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 07 April 2007 05:30, Hugh McMaster wrote:

> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 05/04/07, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Make sure you've got it installed, then add -mno-cygwin to your compiler
>> flags, then please send any followup questions to a mingw mailing list, not
>> here, because you aren't really using cygwin any more, you're compiling a
>> mingw program, and you won't be able to get as good advice here as you
>> would there.
> 
> What was the final decision over the use of -mno-cygwin flags?  I
> thought it was being removed, but couldn't find a message stating
> that.

  That's still the long term plan, but I wasn't planning to rush out a new 3.4
release just to remove it; unless there's some massive clamour, I thought we'd
look at it when we start moving to gcc-4.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/