X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject:  Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1
Date:  Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:12:50 -0500
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <ev0f9i$9s9$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <announce.2bf229d30703260900re818317qdd88a4257c0bae6e@mail.gmail.com>    <82tzvxg5jn.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com>    <2bf229d30704031640q4ef678f9o4c2ee706b914aa43@mail.gmail.com>    <20070404051157.GB16539@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <2bf229d30704040657wd53ee3k49db7263095be24@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0704041029120.6370@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0704041029120.6370@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>>> I thought it was decided to keep the MinGW Runtime man pages separate
>>> >from the Cygwin man pages?
>>>
>>> Yes, it was, but I don't remember concluding that putting them in
>>> /usr/man was the solution.  Please either don't install them at all or
>>> put them in a mingw-specific location.
>> Sorry, I must have come to the wrong conclusion.  I had thought that
>> since Cygwin by default installs man pages to /usr/share/man
>> installing the MinGW specific man pages in /usr/man as long as they
>> were prefixed with 'mingw-' was OK.  This allows users to do a 'man
>> mingw-dirname' without having to modify their MANPATH.
>>
>> If it's desired that they not be included, I'll produce an updated
>> release with them removed.
> 
> IMO, if they are already prefixed by "mingw-", they can go into
> /usr/share/man -- there's no chance they'll be confused with Cygwin's
> manpages.  But perhaps we should move this discussion to -apps, and inform
> this list of the final decision.

Disclaimer: I don't really pay attention to the mingw man pages (but I 
agree they should not be "found" by default).

Anyway, here's a thought that might be useful (unfortunately it seems to 
need a change to man to work nicely*); rather than prefixing pages, add 
them to a 'mingw' section. This way you can find them with 'man -S mingw 
<page>', and users that felt so inclined could add 'mingw' to their MANSECT.

Naturally, you could use symlinks to do this *and* prefix them.

(* 'man mingw <page>' does not work, it seems -S must be used :-(.)

-- 
Matthew
"Will somebody get this walking carpet out of my way?!" -- Princess Leia 
Organa


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/