X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:20:15 +0100 (MET)
From: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: OpenSSH-4.6p1-1: Problems!
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0703120912010.17095-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com


Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> I suggest to take the opportunity to switch to protocol 2 which is
> the better and safer protocol anyway.


I wrote:

> I have tried, but :
>
> $ ssh -2 graziosi@hostname
> Protocol major versions differ: 2 vs. 1
>
> (openssh-4.5p1-1 with -2 gives the some result)
>
> While
>
> $ ssh graziosi@hostname
> Disconnecting: Corrupted check bytes on input.


I contacted the administrator of 'hostname' and he confirmed that
'hostname' accepts only the option '-1' with ssh (even if it would be
better to use -2)!

Using '-2' toward another machine, it works!

So the conclusion is that openssh-4.6p1 seems to have a bug only with
option '-1'.


Cheers,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/