X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:59:04 -0800
From: Nathan Myers <ncm@cantrip.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: a better socketpair
Message-ID: <20070309005904.GM14344@cantrip.org>
References: <20070308223950.GK14344@cantrip.org> <20070308235215.GB7745@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20070309002047.GL14344@cantrip.org> <20070309003308.GA9357@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070309003308.GA9357@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hi Christopher,

Thank you for your quick reply.  I understand that this code might 
not ultimately be useful to cygwin.  It continues to work in my 
project, so I'm not put out.  

I wonder, though, do you know if it might be useful to Mingw?
I.e., might it be worth offering to them, or do you know of a
reason why not to bother?

Google finds lots of complaints about pipes not being usefully 
selectable for writing in cygwin.  Has that been fixed already?

Nathan Myers
ncm@cantrip.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/