X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:41:44 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: javac? Message-ID: <20070304094144.GB3204@interface.famille.thibault.fr> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20070303230154.GR3373@interface.famille.thibault.fr> <20070303231338.GS3373@interface.famille.thibault.fr> <20070304001958.GT3373@interface.famille.thibault.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Hi, Igor Peshansky, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 23:05:31 -0500, a écrit : > > Isn't there a way to have a working javac command by just installing > > cygwin packages, or installing SUN's jdk is necessary? > > The scripts will translate Cygwin paths for you into Windows paths... The > native Windows versions of Java will not understand Cygwin paths. Other > than that, if you're only planning to use relative paths, you can stick > with the native JDK. Well, I rather meant: can't we wrap gcc-java's gcj? Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/