X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45DD3F89.60400@swipnet.se> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:00:25 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: FW: Re: [emacs_user@hotmail.com: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: emacs[5172]: GSlice: failed References: <45D9678E.7090108@swipnet.se> <45DA98EF.6040205@swipnet.se> <45DB2A13.6070606@swipnet.se> <45DC1AAD.5050109@swipnet.se> In-Reply-To: <45DC1AAD.5050109@swipnet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Larry Hall wrote: > Jan DjÃrv wrote: > > Larry Hall wrote: >> Jan D. wrote: > >> It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign >> returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. Shouldn't >> that one be called? > > > Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be controlled by > the emacs configure script to me. > > > > I don't follow. How can the Emacs configure script make sure the Emacs > supplied memalign is called by glib? > > > > Ah, sorry. I missed that you were referring to glib. I agree that there > should be some consistency here. Perhaps things would work better if Emacs > used none of it's own m* implementations. That's just a WAG. I really > have no experience with the Emacs code base. But it does sound to me like > this would be Emacs configurable at least. ;-) I'll try without Emacs own malloc. But dynamic linking on w32 seems strange to me, why is not Emacs own memalign called by glib? Jan D. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/