X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject:  Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.
Date:  Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:52:09 -0600
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <eq7ucq$no9$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <45C69F2F.2060300@users.sourceforge.net>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <45C69F2F.2060300@users.sourceforge.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Will using shell wrappers noticably slow down calls to gcc?  Or should
> we just start explicitly calling i686-pc-cygwin-gcc instead?  (FWIW
> Gentoo does the equivalent of the latter.)

Um. That's a good question. I think the answer to your first question is 
"yes", and it will *also* hurt people not using the cross compiler. 
Therefore I think this might not be a good solution.

The answer to your second question is also "yes" I believe. :-)

-- 
Matthew
This message is non-smoking


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/