X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <45C6ABAB.8030500@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:59:39 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.
References: <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20070205030939.GB24653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <45C6A0DC.3010104@users.sourceforge.net> <20070205033101.GE24653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <45C6A793.8020008@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <45C6A793.8020008@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If you have been reading this list for any length of time then it should
>> be obvious that merely mentioning something in cygwin-announce is not an
>> adequate way to let people know about serious changes.
> 
> Trust me I know; my question is why this is being handled differently
> than other major changes (e.g. bash), or if you're looking for a new way
> in general of notification, particularly as carrying out the change will
> confuse much fewer people than leaving the status-quo.

The discussion has been to augment 'setup.exe' in a way as to provide users
with feedback about "important" package changes in general.  It has come up
in the context of the gcc change but would have to apply generally.
"Important" would be defined by the maintainer by some mechanism.
Presumably, every release of package 'foo' does not trigger the "important"
flag. ;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

