X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45C69F2F.2060300@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:06:23 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc. References: <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> In-Reply-To: <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dave Korn wrote: > > There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go ahead. > Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with shell scripts > that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and redirect to > i686-pc-mingw-{gcc,g++,etc} or to i686-pc-cygwin-{gcc,g++,etc}, just to make > life easier for the backwardly-compatible, but I don't see any reason not to > go ahead and remove the option from the driver. Will using shell wrappers noticably slow down calls to gcc? Or should we just start explicitly calling i686-pc-cygwin-gcc instead? (FWIW Gentoo does the equivalent of the latter.) Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFxp8vpiWmPGlmQSMRCKmkAKCMkLBDBYZ+P8NGLo7eff6+owmvsgCgsDh5 FTvd4ddzyI4MObGrHkRT7ds= =TTvw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/