X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 02:16:48 -0800
From: Christopher Layne <clayne@anodized.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
Message-ID: <20070201101648.GD25688@ns1.anodized.com>
References: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne@ns1.anodized.com
X-Assp-Intended-For: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating
> -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure mingw cross compiler in the
> distribution.  I really don't know why it wasn't done that way to begin
> with.  I have vague recollections of arguing for this when -mno-cygwin
> was first introduced by Geoff Noer but apparently I wasn't very
> persuasive.
> 
> I know that this will probably be another "Death of Cygwin predicted"

Fine by me. Can we slip in removing text mounts at the same time? ;)

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/