X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Eric Lilja Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:16:10 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4C89134832705D4D85A6CD2EBF38AE0FC59E55@PAUMAILU03.ags.agere.com> <20070131175124.GA23286@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <2bf229d30701311137o64e06e1eq8a7dc228982258c3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <2bf229d30701311137o64e06e1eq8a7dc228982258c3@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> I just thought that something which provides similar functionality to >> what is available now would be required. That means MinGW versions of >> gcc and binutils. > > As long as I'm able to compile w32api and mingw-runtime for MinGW from > within Cygwin, I'll be a happy camper. > > Chris > I agree with Chris. If removing -mno-cygwin solves a few problem I'm for it as long as I am to do what Chris mentions without having to install anything other than what's accessible from the cygwin setup. Changing some Makefiles is not an issue for me and if it solves some problems it's a good thing. - Eric -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/