X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:46:09 -0600 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? In-Reply-To: <051f01c74553$d20a4900$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Message-ID: References: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <051f01c74553$d20a4900$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > On 31 January 2007 16:19, Brian Ford wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> If we REALLY wanted to preserve -mno-cygwin, we could do so as a shell > >> script wrapper for gcc but, personally, I think I'd rather just tell > >> people to use the cross-compiler. > > > > Why not just alias -mno-cygwin to -b i686-mingw? > > Because it always works better to invoke the real driver than to try and > play -B/-V games.... :) -V definately, but -b would seem much safer, no? -- Brian Ford Lead Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/