X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <5abc24640701300632h2c71438cg16d41386b5ec66af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:32:54 -0500 From: "Andrew Louie" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Perl bug? In-Reply-To: <4903.67.42.100.49.1170014267.squirrel@67.42.100.49> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070122181727.GC27843@calimero.vinschen.de> <1552.67.40.28.188.1169493973.squirrel@67.40.28.188> <20070122202137.GC20665@calimero.vinschen.de> <45B540FF.6060101@x-ray.at> <20070123083753.GE27843@calimero.vinschen.de> <45B62E0B.4080500@sh.cvut.cz> <45BBCF84.7070409@x-ray.at> <20070128120735.GK27843@calimero.vinschen.de> <4903.67.42.100.49.1170014267.squirrel@67.42.100.49> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > > Thanks for the info. It's interesting to know. What I still don't get, > > however, is the fact that the same statement does not waste memory on > > the x86 Linux Perl 5.8.5, but does on the x86 Cygwin Perl 5.8.7 and the > > x86_64 Linux 5.8.8. So it has been introduced only in later versions? > > And why is it defended? It doesn't seem to make sense, rather on the > > contrary. This question is slightly offtopic, but I am interested in tracking how much memory my perl scripts use, can someone tell me how i could do that? i tried: $strace script.pl strace: error creating process script.pl, (error 193) thanks, -- -Andrew Louie -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/