X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:05:32 +1100 (EST)
From: Luke Kendall <luke.kendall@cisra.canon.com.au>
Subject: Re: Changed handling of "!" in /bin/sh?
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20070117233055.GA21694@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20070118070532.F06FB842EF@pessard.research.canon.com.au>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 17 Jan, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>  On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:14:27PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: 
>  >Eric Blake wrote on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:18 PM: 
>  >> According to Luke Kendall on 1/16/2007 6:53 PM: 
>  >>>  
>  >>> Or, copy /bin/ash.exe to replace /bin/sh.exe. 
>  >>  
>  >> Not recommended.  The reason cygwin moved to bash as 
>  >> /bin/sh was to avoid ash bugs.  
>  > 
>  >I thought that it was more to avoid all the complaints 
>  >that sh did not behave like bash, which is what many 
>  >people expected. 
>   
>  You're right that was also a reason. 

Wow, I'm really showing my age, aren't I? :-)

luke


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/