X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:46:48 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 1.7.0 CVS mmap failure Message-ID: <20070111094647.GQ23638@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20070105095752.GB28768@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070105182234.GC12776@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070105192302.GD12776@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070110095345.GL23638@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070111063859.GF19638@ns1.anodized.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111063859.GF19638@ns1.anodized.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Jan 10 22:38, Christopher Layne wrote: > > Since overmapping doesn't work on Windows, unfortunately, I implemented > > the above mentioned technique, which isn't much code anyway. It > > reserves a memory lot big enough to fit in the whole mapping, memorizes > > the address, free's the memory again and then uses the new address in > > the subsequent real mappings. > > > > This should work (knock on wood) on all systems now. My testcases still > > work on my 512 MB machine, so I'd appreciate if you could give the latest > > snapshot a try on /3GB enabled machines. > > This works on my machine now. So previously why was the former method > failing, do you think? Er... haven't we discussed this at great lengths in this thread? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/