X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:48:05 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.0 CVS mmap failure
Message-ID: <20070109154805.GG23638@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20070105182234.GC12776@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701051237090.2880@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com> <20070105192302.GD12776@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701051513500.2880@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com> <20070106154519.GA19640@ns1.anodized.com> <20070107105844.GB10586@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070109090415.GA19638@ns1.anodized.com> <20070109115643.GD23638@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070109141544.GE19638@ns1.anodized.com> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701090930450.3288@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701090930450.3288@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Jan  9 09:33, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Christopher Layne wrote:
> 
> > extern "C" size_t
> > getpagesize ()
> > {
> >   if (!system_info.dwPageSize)
> >     GetSystemInfo (&system_info);
> >   return (size_t) system_info.dwAllocationGranularity;
> > }
> >
> > size_t
> > getsystempagesize ()
> > {
> >   if (!system_info.dwAllocationGranularity)
> >     GetSystemInfo (&system_info);
> >   return (size_t) system_info.dwPageSize;
> > }
> 
> Um..., don't these functions look backward to anyone else in that the test
> for local cache initialization is not what gets returned.  I know it
> really doesn't matter functionally, but it sure looks confusing ;-).

Agreed.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

