X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:47:43 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Two short scripts for Cygwin-Windows interoperation Message-ID: <20070108094743.GA22258@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <459D5852.8010407@t-online.de> <459D822A.103@t-online.de> <20070105093149.GA28768@calimero.vinschen.de> <45A15636.9000109@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A15636.9000109@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Jan 7 21:21, Christian Franke wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC > >http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI > > > >Come on, what did you expect? ;) > > Hmm...at least some info whether such a patch would be accepted. > (I don't want to do patches which need many iterations or end up in > /dev/null ;-) Christian, you have a Cygwin assignment in place, you have contributed two patches to Cygwin already. Why would you think I wouldn't take this patch if it gets offered and looks ok? Looks good, btw. However, this is a real patch and as such belongs on the cygwin-patches mailing list. Can you please resend it there? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/