X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:45:57 -0800
From: Christopher Layne <clayne@anodized.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.0 CVS mmap failure
Message-ID: <20070105164557.GA12401@ns1.anodized.com>
References: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701041715140.3520@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com> <20070105095752.GB28768@calimero.vinschen.de> <20070105160215.GA5674@ns1.anodized.com> <20070105160650.GJ3521@implementation.labri.fr> <20070105161751.GB5674@ns1.anodized.com> <20070105163436.GA28426@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070105163436.GA28426@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne@ns1.anodized.com
X-Assp-Intended-For: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >MEM_TOP_DOWN
> >0x100000	Allocates memory at the highest possible address.
> >
> >If there were any kind of simple arithmetic bug behind mmap()'s
> >scenes (such as computing space to zero-fill, etc. etc.) I would
> >think ENOMEM would be a very common scenario if we're allocating
> >near the end of addressible space.
> 
>   % grep "simple arithmetic bug" mmap.cc
>   %
> 
> Seems fine to me.
> 
> It's probably a hyperthreaded, dual-core problem.
> 
> cgf

Right, like the mental bash bug I brought up ages ago... Anyways,
I interpret the "grep blah" answer as a "figure it out." I was
throwing out the thoughts to get people moving in parallel on
figuring it out. I can't look into it right now - but was prompted
to add my thoughts since I noticed someone else noticed. I can tell
you this, it's not a machine issue. Something is amiss since the
top down change. I don't have the answer right now as to what it
is and won't be able to debug on my own for a bit (work).

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

