X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Vin Shelton Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: xemacs-21.4.20-2/xemacs-tags-21.4.20-2/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.20-2 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:25:55 -0500 Lines: 27 Message-ID: <45844843.5000101@aoainc.com> References: <45836E46.6080301@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <45836E46.6080301@cwilson.fastmail.fm> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Charles Wilson wrote: > Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >> A new version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you. >> * Fix: xpm no-X builds were broken on cygwin with /bin/gcc. > > Was this a libXpm-noX deficiency, or something else? > >> * Fix: Support renamed xpm no-X library under cygwin. > > Whoops. I meant to include compatibility link/import libraries but I > forgot: e.g. > /usr/lib/noX/libXpm.dll.a -> /usr/lib/noX/libXpm-noX.dll.a > > However, now that xemacs has already adapted to the new name, AND xemacs > is the only known user of this library, I wonder if it is worth it to > release a new version with those compatibility links, now? > > -- > Chuck > In my opinion, it's probably not worth it, but I would revert the patch if you did add the compatibility link. Regards, Vin Shelton XEmacs Release Manager -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/