X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4582C92C.4000306@algonet.se>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:11:24 +0100
From: Magnus Holmgren <lear@algonet.se>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin slower on one computer
References: <45804D3A.6060602@algonet.se> <813e5f920612141419i717e223ds38d20b03ab137a70@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <813e5f920612141419i717e223ds38d20b03ab137a70@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0659-0, 2006-12-15), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hugh McMaster wrote:

> Have you tried enabling the large Windows memory cache option?  This
> should increase your Cygwin compile time immensely.  The build time is
> also related, as you know, to what else is taking CPU time.

No, I haven't, as the test isn't (or shouldn't be) I/O bound. The first 
run can be a bit slower, but following runs are quicker, and appear to 
run entirely from the filesystem cache (and those are the ones I timed). 
And I've run the tests on an idle system.

   Magnus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/