Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:27:22 -0500
From: Jean-Claude Gervais <jc.gervais@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: A regrettable oversight
In-reply-to: <20061215144842.GD3889@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-id: <1166196442.16409.7.camel@mercury.sprymusic>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <035101c72032$07894a00$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>  <Pine.GSO.4.63.0612150836080.26827@access1.cims.nyu.edu>  <20061215135533.GA3889@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>  <Pine.GSO.4.63.0612150920530.26827@access1.cims.nyu.edu>  <20061215144842.GD3889@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

I have to chime in here;
Originally, I became curious about Linux BECAUSE of Cygwin.
As I experimented more and more with Cygwin, I became really impressed
with how it was able to support quite a lot of Linux apps at the source
level will relatively little trouble. The trouble and care the Cygwin
developers have gone to to emulate a real *nix environment on something
as backwards as Windows is truly amazing. A feat hidden from view, like
all great software engineering, of course, but tremendous nonetheless.

Of course digging around *nix via Cygwin ends up being so interesting
that you end up thinking things like "Why is Windows so retarded?" and
eventually the pull of Linux becomes irresistable.

So I eventually switched to Linux, again, because of Cygwin.
I think that that might even be one if Cygwin's unstated goals.

Thank you, devs.

J
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 09:48 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If Cygwin can't adapt to Microsoft innovation then maybe we should all
> either be moving to Linux or MinGW.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/