X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <813e5f920612141419i717e223ds38d20b03ab137a70@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:19:52 +1100
From: "Hugh McMaster" <dasjournal@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin slower on one computer
In-Reply-To: <45804D3A.6060602@algonet.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45804D3A.6060602@algonet.se>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hi Magnus,

Have you tried enabling the large Windows memory cache option?  This
should increase your Cygwin compile time immensely.  The build time is
also related, as you know, to what else is taking CPU time.

Hugh

On 14/12/06, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why Cygwin build things so much slower on one
> computer I have. We're talking about more than 3 times slower on a
> computer that ought to be a bit faster (Athlon64 at 2.2-2.4 GHz,
> compared to a  Pentium M at 1.8 GHz).

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/