X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: Weird cosmetic bug after viewing bash man page Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:48:19 -0600 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Aaron Humphrey wrote: > I've seen this as well, my prompt(and everything I type)turning white > if I don't go through the "bash" man page all the way to the end. I > note that "stty sane" does nothing, nor does hitting enter; my prompt > stays white. (This is in tcsh, where my "prompt" variable is "[%n@%m > %c02]$". In the standard window, it's gray on black.) > > I note that when I look at the man pages for bash, there seems to be a > lot of highlighted-in-white text, a lot more than on the Linux version > of the same page. Perhaps the bash maintainer should be looking at > the codes in the man page? Ok, this is useful; it sounds like 'man bash' is in fact leaving the bold attribute turned on incorrectly. Aaron, in your case your prompt does not clear the attribute; I assume "printf '\033[0m'" fixes things? Does this only happen with the bash manpage, or do you see it with other manpages as well? Btw, what versions of groff and less do you have installed? Also, what is the output of 'man -d bash' (just the part after 'not executing command:', please)? -- Matthew What? This signature /again/? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/