X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:41:12 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: backup privileges
Message-ID: <20061201094112.GK8792@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.20061114101219.GB31134@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20061129T223812-141@post.gmane.org> <20061130090441.GA25001@calimero.vinschen.de> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0611300942010.10187@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <456FACA6.5010507@byu.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <456FACA6.5010507@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Nov 30 21:16, Eric Blake wrote:
>   I still think a
> cygwin flag would be useful.

I still don't think a flag would be a good idea.  It's just another
source of confusion.  However, if you want it, provide a patch, as
long as the default is "off".


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/