X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:02:49 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cp command fails when copying from a network drive Message-ID: <20061123180249.GB32515@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20061123165628.GA32515@calimero.vinschen.de> <003801c70f26$4a379900$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003801c70f26$4a379900$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Nov 23 17:39, Dave Korn wrote: > On 23 November 2006 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Nov 23 16:41, Dave Korn wrote: > >> We have a netapp here, and it doesn't do that at all. > > > > Dave, can you please send the getvolinfo output for this netapp so that > > we can look if it's using the same flags? > > FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH : TRUE > FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES : TRUE > FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK : TRUE > FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS : FALSE Tadam! Here's the difference. John's Netapp returns TRUE for FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS. FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS is a prerequisite for getting real inode numbers, so you just don't have this problem because you already get faked inode numbers. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/