X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:53:28 -0500 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20061024102745.GV8323@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Jonathan Lanier wrote: > Also, because (I know the FAQ > says not to say this, but I think it's useful information in this case) > we have a much older version of Cygwin (cygcheck reports v1.5.14) that > works flawlessly with CIFS and does not suffer the same problems. So, > at the very least, it appears that something changed in Cygwin that is > now exposing the undesired behavior. This should be screaming "way to narrow down the problem" at you; IOW you should try your test with various versions of cygwin1.dll, doing a binary search, until you have a more specific idea of when the behavior "broke". -- Matthew Only Joe suffers from schizophrenia. The rest of us enjoy it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/