X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke@tibco.com>
Subject:  Re: costly accurate link counts, Vista compat...(was Re: questions  about  excessive disk usage when doing tab completion)
Date:  Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:22:41 -0500
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <ehlb41$j6c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <453AAF44.4040201@666.com> <453AB8FD.3030209@byu.net> <453BB9AD.7010505@tlinx.org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <453BB9AD.7010505@tlinx.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Linda Walsh wrote:
> Of course Cygwin is already faster than MS's own POSIX subsystem;
> Such compatibility may be one reason why MS dropped future revisions
> of their Interix (POSIX) subsystem support.  I wonder if it even
> runs on Vista?  For that matter, anyone tried Cygwin to see if there are 
> any compatibility issues for Cygwin on Vista?

Eh? That would be news to me. Last I heard it had become "SUA" (Services 
for UNIX-based Applications) and was a core component of Windows.

But it still sucks. :-)

-- 
Matthew
Only Joe suffers from schizophrenia. The rest of us enjoy it.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/