X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45340841.3000903@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:31:29 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Can't preview postscript files under xdvi References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Angelo Graziosi wrote: >> If Cygwin aims to reproduce Linux on Windows who installs Cygwin should >> also installs a minimum of X. > > I don't recall installing X being a prerequisite of a functional, useful > Linux system. I regularly use Linux boxes for which my need for X is > minimal-to-nonexistent. > Agreed. We'll see problems on this list regardless. The focus should be on making these two packages play nicely together. Input on this would be most useful. Of course, if the maintainers of these packages decide to do something other than what I've stated, that's certainly their prerogative. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/