X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: Similar Bash 3.1.18 CR/LF Problem Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:14:17 -0500 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <451D589C.9070609@cygwin.com> <657A9BE009D3504AAE29BD8E8C2DD61E01A5ABF0@SDGEXEVS02.corp.intuit.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <657A9BE009D3504AAE29BD8E8C2DD61E01A5ABF0@SDGEXEVS02.corp.intuit.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Wilks, Dan wrote: > So we just got the short-end? A long(?) standing behavior of cygwin > and DOS paths and a recent change to bash that eliminates support for > \r's. I guess we were living on the edge of something that wasn't > supposed to work at all and didn't even know it. :/ > > We'll try to figure out some workaround for our environment. I just > wish going "pure cygwin" was an option. Well, as we like to say here, http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC. Since Eric is currently amenable to adding a shopt to bash, you have the option of implementing it yourself and submitting the patch for upstream consideration. -- Matthew My preferred shell is Christian. It's Bourne Again. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/