X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4518F0DA.4090404@equate.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:20:26 +0100 From: Chris Taylor Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Install hangs References: <078401c6e14c$cdd859f0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> In-Reply-To: <078401c6e14c$cdd859f0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Dave Korn wrote: > On 26 September 2006 05:22, Artie Ziff wrote: > >> I recently experienced a similar scenario, posted a general description >> of the user experience (with some questions) in an attempt to elicit >> general comments. I rcv'd the same response as those before me... as is >> evidenced in the archives. That is, no response. I suppose the >> philosophy is: if there is no response then no problem exists. ;-) > > Nope. The philosophy is: if there is no information, then no diagnosis can > be made. > >>> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Cygchecks, gentlemen, please. As attachments, please. Let's see what > you've got so far, and then later we might need to look at setup logs and > suchlike. > > cheers, > DaveK I wonder if perhaps they think they can't run cygcheck because they haven't finished installing cygwin yet? It does seem that many people are unaware that cygcheck is a native win32 binary... Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/