X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:48:15 -0700
From: Christopher Layne <clayne@anodized.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: bash-3.1-7$B!!(BBUG
Message-ID: <20060921034815.GC6790@ns1.anodized.com>
References: <20060913052510.GB1256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <loom.20060913T160909-692@post.gmane.org> <ee9oa9$sj$1@sea.gmane.org> <ee9q53$74g$1@sea.gmane.org> <loom.20060913T234039-426@post.gmane.org> <ee9vg0$qeb$1@sea.gmane.org> <45089854.8010705@scytek.de> <20060914001902.GB24899@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4508ABAF.5090408@scytek.de> <20060914020737.GC24899@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060914020737.GC24899@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne@ns1.anodized.com
X-Assp-Intended-For: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> I suspect that the "Well, they can just install Linux (floppies, CDs,
> DVDs) if they feel like it" observation has been made several times a
> year for the last ten years.  It's obviously not a very powerful
> argument since Cygwin is still here and you can't really assert that the
> only reason it is here is because make understood MS-DOS paths or bash
> dealt properly with \r\n line endings.

I personally use Cygwin to make full use of a unix shell and environ along
side windows - typically with around 8-10 puttycygs open along with NX clients
to Linux machines running NX. Since it's inevitable that windows will creep
into things, there's not much one can do to get around it - aside from making
a personal pact 'not going to use windows' - which we've all most likely done
and eventually failed out. That being said, if I didn't require just a few
windows applications that I use aside from Cygwin, I'd be running KDE/Linux 2.6
on this box in a heartbeat. That being said, I think cygwin is great, and I
find it invaluable under windows. I really couldn't imagine using MSW without
cygwin.

> I doubt that Eric will want to deal with the fallout of having bash not
> understand \r\n line endings but, if he does, it would be his decision
> and, again, I would support it 100%.  I am very eager to see things like
> configure scripts work faster and if we have to drop a few scared or
> lazy people along the way to accomplish that goal, that's fine with me.
> I have no problem at all with being a part of a smaller community which
> doesn't need to use notepad to edit their bash scripts.

Yep - and what section of the bell curve do people who write in bash/sh *on*
cygwin *also* use notepad to edit the files? I would think 95% are using
vi/vim.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

