Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817111612.03b50010@pop.nycap.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:25:33 -0400
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist@nycap.rr.com>
Subject: RE: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
In-Reply-To: <00f501c6c20f$29eddbf0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>  <00f501c6c20f$29eddbf0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

At 11:09 AM 8/17/2006, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 17 August 2006 16:01, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>
>> At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for this.
>>> Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you?
>>> 
>>> If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would behoove
>>> you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was populated by people
>>> who are familiar with it.
>> 
>> Because I do not agree with your suggestion.   
>
>  You don't agree that this is the cygwin list, not the mingw list?
>
>  That really explains everything that's wrong with you in a single sentence.
I answered a question posted on this list. I certainly never said this was the mingw list,
I said that this topic was IMO fair for this list.  Those are two different things.
You are misquoting me. 

-Bill


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/