X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:10:46 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
Message-ID: <20060817151046.GI17328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <6.2.0.14.2.20060814213115.093f2a40@pop.nycap.rr.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0608142225030.13215@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <20060815031725.GB18949@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <6.2.3.4.2.20060815083334.07ab5470@pop.nycap.rr.com> <20060815210221.GB4783@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <6.2.3.4.2.20060816092323.0b449ad0@pop.nycap.rr.com> <E1GDdID-0001Dt-F9@fencepost.gnu.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060817090639.0a662c40@pop.nycap.rr.com> <20060817144927.GG17328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:00:48AM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for
>>this.  Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you?
>>
>>If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would
>>behoove you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was
>>populated by people who are familiar with it.
>
>Because I do not agree with your suggestion.  Apparently you need
>things repeated to you.  So, here is my reason for the post again.  You
>mentioned MinGW as an alternative, it does not work.  Also, someone on
>this list asked me a question, and I answered it.

Again, you don't know if it works since you just tried it, saw a
problem, and reported it here without asking for clarification on the
mingw list.  I just checked and see no email from you over there.

I made this point in the original message.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

