X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <44CFFDF6.9060002@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:20:54 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20060112 Fedora/1.5-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.5.20(0.156/4/2) pipe hangs, dos files
References: <20060801141450.88222.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060801141450.88222.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Saurabh Tendulkar wrote:
> I guess I must send this again since no one replied the first time. 

<snip>

Actually, no.  If you don't receive a response with your first inquiry,
sending a copy of the first prefaced with an argument that you're repeating
your plea isn't the right approach.  It often leads to the opposite result
of what you want.

FWIW, I saw no problem when I tried your test case, though at the time, I
was working with an earlier version of 'coreutils' at the time.  I haven't
had a chance to update and rerun yet.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/