X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:30:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: dlopen error Message-ID: <20060731153024.GB367@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:14:17PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>What does a "false positive" have to do with the simple request to >>attach cygcheck output? You do see that many people manage to do this, >>right? So, there should be no reason why you can't do so as well. > >Previously (as one can verify from Cygwin archives) the cygwin users >have met difficulties in sending their emails attaching the cygcheck >output: the emails were rejected because suspected of SPAM. So, "false positive" in this case refers to the mailing list spam software considering non-spam email to be spam. I don't recall many (any?) cases where this has affected people in such a way as they have been unable to follow the instructions in the bounce messages so that they can unblock themselves. However, ignoring the bounce messages and complaining about difficulties sending email is one of the fun off-topic activities that are typical of the cygwin lists. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/