X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:31:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Problem with grep -Fwf (version 2.5.1a-1 and 2.5.1a-2) Message-ID: <20060728203124.GB8071@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20060728190502.GA8071@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:12:24PM -0400, Daniel Einspanjer wrote: >I'm sorry, the message appeared to be formatted properly when I posted it >but something must have happened during transmission. Each file should >have three lines. the data file has abc, def, and ghi. The filter file has >abc, de, and ghi. The de line is significant to test the -w whole word >matching flag. >I appreciate your looking at this and I'm sorry for the confusion. Could >you try it again with the files the way I just described and see if you >might be able to reproduce the problem? > >===== data.txt ===== >abc >def >ghi >========== >===== filter.txt ===== >abc >de >ghi >========== Yes, I can reproduce it now and see that it goes away if I update the grep sources with patches from the FC5 release. I'll release a new version of grep this weekend. I wonder why every test case I tried worked. I didn't think I had the standard developer's blind spot for grep. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/