X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <44A8B57E.7040805@x-ray.at>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:13:18 +0200
From: Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 SeaMonkey/1.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: MEX interface + DAE solvers in Fortran + gnumex/cygwin/mingw
References: <20060701152812.67756.qmail@web51513.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060701152812.67756.qmail@web51513.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

James R. Phillips schrieb:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>> But no simulink :(
> 
> Hm, have you looked at scilab (http://www.scilab.org).  It is a matlab clone
> _with_ a simulink clone (scicos).  Unfortunately, while it is open source, it
> is non-free, so can't be linked with cygwin1.dll.  _But_, they
> compile/distribute their own windows native version anyway; available from
> their website.  Check it out.  While free is better than non-free, open-source
> is better than closed.

Thanks for the link.
For my company, my clients and me Simulink is better than open-source.
-- 
Reini

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/