X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <44A3F2CF.3040503@netbauds.net>
Date: 	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:33:35 +0100
From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060614 SeaMonkey/1.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Proposal: select(2) writability notifcation vs write operations  on  pipes
References: <44A348D1.6070908@netbauds.net> <44A3F101.2070400@netbauds.net>
In-Reply-To: <44A3F101.2070400@netbauds.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Darryl Miles wrote:
> * That all writing to WIN32 NamedPipes is done non-blocking version of 
> WriteFileEx() call.  If the response back from the WIN32 kernel is that 
> it can't take the data yet (would have blocked) then the following plan 
> jumps into action:

Opps, I should have added that the plan jumps into action only if the 
POSIX side (we are emulating) has the fd set in blocking mode.  If its 
in non-blocking mode we would return -1 EAGAIN from the write() call.

Darryl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/