X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:54:08 -0700 From: clayne@anodized.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: g++ 4.1? Message-ID: <20060626235408.GD6792@ns1.anodized.com> References: <44987580.32006EA@dessent.net> <449BE972.B1D2CA47@dessent.net> <449C5B93.1000805@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <449C88AB.55A2F04A@dessent.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000 X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne@ns1.anodized.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com It should also be noted that some of the latest snapshot, or code that still exists in the latest snapshot, will fail under 4.1.1. Specifically: declaration of objects within a label statement. -cl On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:52:41PM +0100, Joe Schmoe wrote: > Thanks to all that encouragement, I now have not one but two working > installations of gcc-4.1.1. As Brian said, the cygwin compiler will > configure and make with no problems, except that -mno-cygwin doesn't > work. For a no-cygwin compiler, this is what I did -- I'm not saying -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/