X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: fork failure patch for cygrunsrv
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:03:59 +0100
Message-ID: <016601c6937f$4d55dc00$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <127543258B0B9054522CC18C@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On 18 June 2006 20:30, Robin Walker wrote:

> --On 16 June 2006 16:49 -0400 "Hochstedler, Ben (GE Healthcare)" wrote:
> 
>> fork() can fail when the system runs out of non-interactive heap space
>> (because there's not enough heap memory to allocate to the launched
>> process).
> 
> If we, as end-users, suffer from fork() failing for the above reason, which
> parameter should be adjusted so that there is enough heap memory available
> for fork() not to fail like this?

  Read the referred MSDN article; it has a registry setting to adjust.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/