X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:49:00 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Reading a write-only file doesn't set error condition (was Re:  Cygwin fread on Write-Only File Descriptor returns undefined state)
Message-ID: <20060614164900.GW16683@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, newlib@sourceware.org
References: <448F9EA1.7050908@tlinx.org> <20060614082441.GA6326@calimero.vinschen.de> <4490370B.7080609@tlinx.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4490370B.7080609@tlinx.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Jun 14 09:19, Linda Walsh wrote:
>   Er, are you referring to the case of zero possibly being
> a valid return value if the program requests zero bytes be read?
> I didn't say "only 0"...  I new about the other values<count,
> but was focusing on the conditions that would exist only when
> a 0 was returned for the return value.

Nope, sorry, I just got you wrong.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/